False Memory Syndrom
RECOVERED MEMORY THERAPY AND FALSE MEMORY SYNDROME:
RECENT LEGAL TRENDS
John Hochman, M.D.
72764,2647
Thousands of patients (mostly women) in the United have undergone or are
undergoing attempted treatment by psychotherapists for a non-existent memory
disorder. As a result, these same therapists have unwittingly promoted the
development of a real memory disorder: False Memory Syndrome. To make sense
of this unfortunate situation, I need to offer a few definitions.
Some psychotherapists believe that childhood sexual abuse is the specific
cause of numerous physical and mental ills later in life. Some term this
Incest Survivor Syndrome (ISS). There is no firm evidence that this is the
case, since even where there has been documented sexual abuse during
childhood, there are numerous other factors that can explain physical or
emotional complaints that appear years later in an adult.
These therapists believe that the children immediately Repress all memory of
sexual abuse shortly after it occurs, causing it to vanish from recollection
without a trace. The price for having repressed memories is said to be the
eventual development of ISS
Therapists attempt to "cure" ISS by engaging patients in Recovered Memory
Therapy (RMT), a hodge-podge of techniques varying with each therapist.
The purpose of RMT is to enable the patient to recover into consciousness not
only wholly accurate recollections of ancient sexual traumas, but also
repressed body memories (such as physical pains) that occurred at the time of
the traumas.
In actuality, RMT produces disturbing fantasies which are misperceived by
patient and misinterpreted by the therapist as memories. Mislabeled by the
therapist and patient as Recovered Memories, they are actually False
Memories.
The vast majority of false memory cases developing from RMT are in women,
which is why this article assumes patients to be female.
INITIATION OF PATIENTS INTO RMT
A woman consults a psychotherapist for relief of various emotional
complaints. The therapist informs her that she have been molested as a child
and doesn't know it, and this could explain her symptoms. Some patients
think this idea is absurd and go to another therapist; others accept the
therapist's suggestions and stay on. More than a few women have heard about
repressed memories from talk shows or tabloids even prior to coming to the
therapists office, and may even make the appointment believing they too could
be "victims"
Though the patient has no memories of abuse, she becomes motivated for
"memory recovery" since she is told this will cure her symptoms. The
therapist will offer encouragement that "memories" will return. Suggestive
dreams or new pains are interpreted by the therapist as proof that repressed
memories are lurking.
The therapist may refer the patient to a "survivor recovery group." There
she will meet women who further encourage her to keep trying to remember.
Attendance at these support groups, as well as assigned reading in self-help
books, surrounds the patient with validation for the therapist's theories.
The vast majority of women with FMS are white, middle class, and above
average in education. This corresponds to the profile of a typical woman who
enters long term psychotherapy, and who perceives such activity as an
important way to solve life's problem.
GENERATING FALSE MEMORIES
Unlike courts of law where which attempt to obtain evidence where allegations
of evildoing are made, RMT solely directs the patient to attend toward her
inner world for "proof" she was sexually abused. Such RMT techniques may
include:
---amytal interviews where the patient is given sodium amytal, a short acting
barbiturate, which is incorrectly described as a "truth serum" that will jar
ancient memories from the hidden chambers.
---hypnosis (including "age regression" where the patient is told she is
temporarily being transformed into the way she was when she was five years
old).
---guided imagery in which patients are told to close their eyes and are
talked through a state of heightened imagination which has a quasi-
hallucinatory quality. Often this produces a hypnotic state with neither the
patient or the therapist realizing that hypnosis is taking place.
---Spontaneous fantasy production through drawings, associations to dreams,
and stream of consciousness journal writing.
---Hearing or reading about the "recovered memories" of other women.
as inspirations.
---Combing family albums for telltale signs; the patient is told that if she
looks sad or preoccupied in some of her childhood photos, this is further
confirmation that abuse occurred.
THE DARK SIDE OF "RECOVERY"
Patients start out RMT with the hope that things will be better once they
recover their repressed memories. But usually life becomes far more
complicated.
The FMS patient will often become estranged from the "perpetrator" (most
often her father). If the patient has small children, they will be off
limits to "perpetrators" as well. Relationships with other family members
become contingent on their not challenging the patient's beliefs.
Therapists may urge parents to come for a "family conference" in order to
allow the patient to surprise the "perpetrator" with a rehearsed
confrontation. Family members are usually too shocked and disorganized to
coherently respond to accusations. The rationale for this scenario is that
since "survivors" feel powerless, they need "empowerment."
FMS patients may file belated crime reports with local law enforcement
agencies and may go one to sue "perpetrators." A particular benefit for
therapists is that in many states, filing a crime report permits bills to be
paid through a state crime victims fund.
Preoccupied with the continuing chores of "memory recovery," the FMS patient
may come to ignore more pressing problems with her marriage, family,
schooling, or career. Often the time demands and expense of the therapy
itself become a major life disruption.
Some patients during the course of RMT are told by their therapists that
variations in their moods or thought patterns during the course of a week is
a symptom of separate personalities that have been repressed along with
repressed memories. Therapists who advise patients that they also have
"multiple personality disorder" (MPD) are told that their recovery requires
that each personality become aware of each other so that "reintegration" can
take place. "The Three Faces of Eve" meets hyperinflation, and some women
come to believe they are repositories of dozens of hidden
personalities ("alters"), with their own names and characteristics; some
alters seem to male or even animal personalities. An increasing number of
psychiatrists and psychologists are coming to view MPD as a product of
environmental suggestion and reinforcement, since the diagnosis was hardly
made prior to ten years ago. One area where there is no controversy: once
MPD is diagnosed, therapy bills become astronomical.
Some FMS patients become convinced that their abuse was actually "Satanic
ritual abuse" (SRA), due to participation by relatives in a secret Satanic
cult. Some therapists believe SRA is the work of a vast underground cult
network in these United States. One clinician on the lecture circuit
explained to spellbound audiences that the cult was brought to the US by a
Hasidic Jew who was protected by the Nazis in exchange for his teaching them
the secrets of Kaballah; this mystical troupe was purportedly brought to the
U.S. after the War to help the CIA in mind control research. No evidence
beyond "recovered memories" has ever been offered as proof that such a cult
exists. Therapists who lecture on the topic have explained away the lack of
evidence that such a cult exists, by claiming that no defectors speak out due
to iron-clad secrecy via brainwashing and terror. Miraculously, none of
these outspoken "satan-experts" has ever been a target of assassination.
THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF FALSE MEMORIES
FMS involves a combination of mistaken perceptions and false beliefs. The
fledgling FMS patient is encouraged to "connect" with an environment that
will reinforce the FMS state, and is encouraged to "disconnect" from people
or information that might lead her to question the results of RMT.
The FMS subculture is victim-oriented. Even though they have not undergone
anticancer chemotherapy or walked away from airplane crashes, FMS patients
are told they too are "survivors." This becomes a kind of new identity,
giving FMS patients the feeling of a strong bond with other "survivors" of
abuse. Patients will often start attending "survivor" support groups,
subscribe to "survivor" newsletters, or even attend "survivor" conventions
(sometimes with their therapists). For some, this gives previously empty
lives a stirring core of meaning and purpose
They will read books found in "Recovery" sections of bookstores. The best
know book, The Courage to Heal, is weighty, literate, and thus appears
authoritative. Authors Laura Davis and Ellen Bass have no formal training in
psychology, psychiatry or memory. This paperback, modestly priced at $20,
has sold over 700,000 copies.
Patients are told to shy away from dialogue with skeptical friends or
relatives, since this will hinder their "recovery." "Perpetrators" who
proclaim their innocence can't be taken seriously since they are "in denial"
and incapable of telling the truth.
Aside from these social influences, people by nature often resist seeing
themselves as being in error. It can be terribly painful to acknowledge
having made a big mistake, particular when harmful consequences have
resulted.
RMT exploits the tendency within each of us to blame others for our problems,
and to latch onto simple answers for life's complicated problems. The RMT
therapists suggest that aside from entirely ruining childhoods, childhood
sexual abuse can explain everything and everything that goes wrong during
adulthood. RMT becomes the ultimate crybaby therapy
HOW MEMORY REALLY WORKS
In Freud's theory of "repression," the mind automatically banished traumatic
events from memory to prevent overwhelming anxiety. Freud further theorized
that repressed memories caused "neurosis," which could be cured if the
memories were made conscious. While all this is taught in psychology 101 and
has been taken by novelists and screenwriters to be a truism, Freud's
repression theory has never been verified by rigorous scientific proof.
Freud, were he alive today, would be traumatized to see how RMT has redefined
his pet concept. While Freud talked of the repression of single traumatic
episodes, today's therapists maintain that dozens of similar traumatic
episodes occurring over years are repressed with 100% efficiency, within
minutes of each trauma occurring.
The well known syndrome of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder shows us that
verifiable traumatic events, rather than disappearing from memory, leave
trauma victims haunted by intrusive memories in which the victim relives the
trauma. For those who were in Nazi concentration or underwent torture as
POWs in Vietnam, this can become a disabling lifelong problem.
People forget most of what occurs to them, including some events that were
significant to them at the time. If an event is lost from memory, there is
no objective way to prove whether it was "repressed" or simply forgotten.
And there is no reason that memories of sexual abuse should be handled any
differently than childhood memories of physical abuse or of emergency
surgery.
Events that have slipped away from memory cannot be recalled with the
accuracy of a videotape. Individuals forget not only insignificant events in
their entirety, but also significant events. Some events (traumatic or not)
are recalled, but with significant details altered.
A study of children whose school was attacked by a sniper showed that some
who were not on the school grounds later insisted they had personal
recollections of being in school during the attack. These false memories
apparently were inspired by exposure to the stories of those who truly
experienced the trauma
Memories can be deliberately distorted in adults by presenting a display of
visual information, and later exposing subjects to verbal disinformation
about what they saw. This disinformation often becomes incorporated into
memory, contaminating the ultimate memories that are recalled.
Some who enter therapy were abused as children, and have always remembered
this abuse. They don't need special help in "memory recovery" to tell the
therapist what happened to them.
WHY RECOVERED MEMORY THERAPY IS BAD THERAPY
RMT purportedly is undertaken to help patients recover from the effects of
sexual abuse from childhood; however, at the onset of RMT there is no
evidence that such abuse ever occurred. Thus, instead of a therapist having
some evidence for a diagnosis and then adopting a proper treatment plan, RMT
therapists use the "treatment" to produce their diagnosis.
Some RMT therapists overattribute common psychological complaints as signs of
forgotten childhood sexual abuse. In their zeal to find memories, these
therapists overlook any and all alternative explanations for the patient's
complaints.
RMT therapists ignore basic psychological principles that all individuals are
suggestible, and that patients in distress seeking psychotherapy are
particularly likely to adopt beliefs and biases of their therapist.
Many RMT therapists have neither studied basic sciences related to memory, or
the diagnosis of actual diseases of memory. Their knowledge is often based
on a single weekend seminar as opposed to formal training in any graduate
program they attended to get their license.
Hypnosis and sodium amytal administration ("truth serum") are unacceptable
procedures for memory recovery. Courts reject hypnosis as a memory aid.
Subjects receiving hypnosis or amytal as general memory aids (even in
instances where there is no question of sexual abuse) will often generate
false memories. Upon returning to their normal state of consciousness,
subjects assume all their refreshed "memories" are equally true.
RMT therapists generally make no attempt to verify "recovered memories" by
interviewing third parties, or obtaining pediatric or school records. Some
have explained that they don't verify the serious allegations that arise from
RMT because they their job is simply to help the patient feel "safe" and
"recover."
Many patients who have known all their lives that they were mistreated or
neglected by their parents, decide as adults to be friends with the offending
parents. By contrast, RMT therapists encourage their patients, on the basis
of "recovered memories," to break off relationships with the alleged
"perpetrators" as well as other relatives who disagree with the patient's
views. This is completely at odds with the traditional goals of
therapists: to allow competent patients to make their own important
decisions, and to improve their patient's relationships with others.
Patients undergoing RMT often undergo an increase of symptoms as their
treatment progresses, with corresponding disruption in their personal lives.
Few therapists will seek consultation in order to clarify the problem,
assuming instead that it is due to sexual abuse having being worse than
anyone might have imagined.
In a recent statement, the American Psychiatric Association cautioned that
there is no way to establish the veracity of accusations that arise out of
RMT in the absence of objective supporting evidence. The American Medical
Association has restated prior positions that Hypnosis is unreliable as aid
for valid memory recovery.
OTHER KINDS OF FMS
Some individuals come to believe that they lived "past lives" as a result of
having undergone "past life therapy." This phenomenon generally develops in
participants who are grounded in the New Age zeitgeist and already open to
"discovering" their past lives. They enroll in seminars which can run up to
an entire weekend and will involve some measure of group hypnotic induction
and guided meditations. This sort of FMS also involves continuing group
reinforcement. In contrast to horrific images of sexual abuse, recollections
of "past lives" are generally pleasant and interesting. Few participants
will recall spending prior lives in lunatic asylums or dungeons. The whole
experience is assumed to be therapeutic by helping participants better
understand the situation of their present lives.
A small number of individuals develop "recovered memories" of being abducted
by aliens from outer space. Almost always, these individuals had some
curiosity about this area and were hardly skeptics before they fell into an
alien abduction FMS.
In contrast to women who are plagued with concerns that they were sexually
abused, these varieties of FMS of a much more benign nature and do not
disrupt personal functioning or family life. While some of these individuals
suffer the ignominy of being perceived as "kooks," they may receive
compensating group support from those who share their beliefs.
SOME LEGAL ASPECTS OF FALSE MEMORY SYNDROME
In spite of the shakey foundations on which RMT is built, in the past five
years legislatures and courts in 23 states both tolled the statutes of
limitations when molestation is alleged, based on the assumption that
individuals should not be penalized for having repressed memories. In Hood
v. Herald (Summit County, Ohio, Common Pleas Court) a woman received a $5.15
million dollar judgment, with the evidence hinging on recovered memories
filled with misdeeds of her uncle. Women who testify on the basis of their
recovered memories are thoroughly convinced of their veracity and can make
compelling witnesses.
During the years these lawsuits were first being introduced, the vast
majority of psychiatrist and psychologists were unaware of the false memory
phenomenon, let alone being able to explain it. Much of the legislation
supporting the RMT as well as numerous Amicus Briefs, resulted from efforts
of zealous therapists sometimes allied with gender feminists within the
Women's Movement. (While "equity feminists" are concerned with the struggle
for equal opportunities for women in academia or the workplace, "gender
feminists" are concerned that men are not only an implicit threat to women,
children, and even to worldwide ecology, and thus need to reined in). For
the busy legislator, tolling a statute certainly would have seemed to be a
good enough idea. It was said to help victimized women, bring unpunished
child molesters to justice, and would involve no new taxes.
In recent years there have been numerous civil lawsuits based on RMT with
grown children suing one or more family members. Even in cases where there
is a defense verdict, plaintiffs remain convinced that their recovered
memories are indeed accurate.
In 1993 in the case of Steven J. Cook v Joseph Cardinal Bernadin et al, the
plaintiff announced over CNN that he was sexually molested years earlier when
he was a seminary student by two clerics, including the then Archbishop of
Cincinnati Joseph Bernadin. However a few months later, Mr. Cook dropped
charges against the Cardinal, indicating that these were based on recovered
memories from therapy, and he had come to learn that such memories could be
unreliable.
In the recent case of Ramona v. Ramona, a California winery executive won a
malpractice action against his daughter's therapists. Holly Ramona, while a
college student, underwent an Amytal interview as part of her RMT. She
became convinced as a result that her father had molested her; this led to
her father, Gary, losing his job and losing his wife. He was found to have
standing to sue because he was seen by one of the therapists in family
session. The other end of the case, the civil action filed by the daughter
against her father, will be heard later this year.
There are an increasing number of women who are retracting their false
memories and are suing therapists for malpractice. One such case settled for
a very large amount in Texas earlier this year. One malpractice insurance
carrier for clinical psychologists in California recently tripled their rates
without explanation; this has led to speculation that the carrier is
anticipating increasing numbers of lawsuits alleging that psychologists
caused FMS.
AND NOW, A WORD ABOUT THE FUTURE....
Women who retract their claims of abuse may do so spontaneously when they
relocate to another locale and lose contact with their prior therapists and
support group. Without the "positive reinforcement" from others to encourage
false memory development and maintenance, some women begin to doubt the
veracity of what they had believed was true. While some remain suspended in
a twilight of doubt, others have fully recanted.
These retractors may have a profound influence on getting women with an
active FMS to re-evaluate their situation. While FMS patients learn from the
FMS culture to dismiss critics as either "perpetrators" or their apologists,
the voice of a woman who says she is recovering from FMS is more easily
heard.
Although most influential among family counselors and social workers, RMT
has affected the practices of some licensed psychologists and psychiatrists.
Some RMT goes on in special "dissociative disorders units" in psychiatric
hospitals. These activities have gone on with little challenge, until
recently, and many of these units have been cash cows for hospitals
experiencing financial setbacks from restrictions of managed care.
Meanwhile, there is a large FMS subculture consisting of women convinced that
their "recovered memories" are accurate, therapists keeping busy doing RMT,
and of authors on the "recovery" lecture circuit. Skeptical challenges to
RMT are met be emotional rejoinders that critics are front groups for
perpetrators, and that "some people say the Holocaust didn't happen."
RMT will eventually disappear, but not next month.
THIS ARTICLE is a revised version of an article published in the Skeptic
Magazine earlier this year. The author is a psychiatrist in Encino,
California, and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of the False Memory
Syndrome Foundation in Philadelphia.